As an embarrassing example of how unreliable Places is, the New York Times this week published an expose about the apparently widespread problem of sabotage on the service. Places data also shows up on Google Maps, associated with each business’s location. “Closed” or “open” status is either true or false. As such, it’s a relatively easy thing to check. The hidden problem with sites like Places, as well as Yelp, is the unmeasurable “reviews” portion of each service. It’s very easy for a business owner to write fake positive reviews for his own business, and fake bad reviews for the competition. The Times also published another expose recently about the growing industry of fake restaurant and hotel reviews for hire. Zagat’s reviews are more reliable in part because participation is more time consuming and engaging, and also because Zagat uses editors to filter comments. Zagat also polices results, and threatens on its website to remove any establishment caught violating its Content Creation Policy.
Tricare, an insurance-style program covering nearly 4 million active-duty military and retirees, says the scientific evidence does not justify providing comprehensive cognitive rehabilitation. Tricare officials say an assessment of the available research that they commissioned last year shows that the therapy is not well proven. But an investigation by NPR and ProPublica found that internal and external reviewers of the Tricare-funded assessment criticized it as fundamentally misguided. Confidential documents obtained by NPR and ProPublica show that reviewers called the Tricare study “deeply flawed,” “unacceptable” and “dismaying.” One top scientist called the assessment a “misuse” of science designed to deny treatment for service members. Tricare’s stance is also at odds with some medical groups, years of research and even other branches of the Pentagon. Last year, a panel of 50 civilian and military brain specialists convened by the Pentagon unanimously concluded that cognitive therapy was an effective treatment that would help many brain-damaged troops. More than a decade ago, a similar panel convened by the National Institutes of Health reached a similar consensus.
What are the terms and conditions of the Quest App Airpoints promotion? What are the general Quest terms and conditions for Airpoints? Is a security bond required? What do I need for check-in? What time is check-in? What time is check-out? I need to conduct a meeting during my stay – what are my options? Does Quest have a business centre? Does Quest have a reception? What happens if I need something after hours? Do I have to do my own washing and make the bed? I’m only staying for two nights – can I still stay at Quest? Where do I park? What are my food and beverage options? What is a serviced apartment? A Quest serviced apartment is your home and office away from home. At Quest, all properties offer a variety of spacious apartment configurations to suit singles, couples, small groups and large groups, from studios to four-bedroom apartments. Most two and three-bedroom apartments contain a second bathroom, and adjoining apartments can also be reserved on request.
14 No. 2, pp. Kaynama, S.A. and Black, C.I. 2000), “A proposal to assess the service quality of online travel agencies: an exploratory study”, Journal of Professional Services Marketing, Vol. 21 No. 1, pp. Kim, D.J., Kim, W.G. Han, J.S. (2007), “A perceptual mapping of online travel agencies and preference attributes”, Tourism Management, Vol. 28 No. 2, pp. Kim, W.G. and Park, S.A. 2017), “Social media review rating versus traditional customer satisfaction”, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. Koc, E. and Boz, H. (2019), “Development of hospitality and tourism employees’ emotional intelligence through developing their emotion recognition abilities”, Journal of Hospitality Marketing & Management, pp. Lamest, M. and Brady, M. (2019), “Data-focused managerial challenges within the hotel sector”, Tourism Review, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. Lee, J.W., Jones, P.S., Mineyama, Y. and Zhang, X.E. 2002), “Cultural differences in responses to a likert scale”, Research in Nursing & Health, Vol.
